论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比阴道B超与腹部B超诊断异位妊娠的价值,为临床治疗提供可靠而又正确的依据。方法:选择2014年1月~12月异位妊娠患者72例,这72例患者均既进行阴道B超检查,又进行腹部B超检查,比较两次B超诊断符合情况。结果:阴道B超诊断符合率为94.4%,腹部B超诊断符合率为83.3%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:阴道B超诊断异位妊娠的价值高于腹部B超诊断异位妊娠价值,在临床中应该进一步的推广。
Objective: To compare the diagnostic value of vaginal ultrasonography with abdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, providing a reliable and correct basis for clinical treatment. Methods: Seventy-two patients with ectopic pregnancy were selected from January 2014 to December 2014. All of the 72 patients underwent both B-mode ultrasonography and B-mode ultrasonography. The comparisons of two B-ultrasound diagnoses were made. Results: The coincidence rate of vaginal ultrasonography was 94.4%, and the coincidence rate of abdominal ultrasonography was 83.3%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The diagnostic value of vaginal ultrasonography in diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy is higher than that of diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy by abdominal ultrasonography, which should be further popularized in clinic.