《唐会要》是最早的会要体史书,是研究唐代典章制度的重要文献。但长期以来,主要以抄本形式流传,脱误颇多。清时经四库馆臣校订补正,形成四库本。其后又由武英殿刊刻,形成所谓殿版刻本,遂成今之通行本。本文通过对静嘉堂抄本、台北“国立中央”图书馆所藏A、B抄本,以及四库本、殿本五种版本对照分析,对学界过去有关《唐会要》的一些错误认识进行了修正,阐明了诸版本之间的关系。台北B抄本与静嘉堂抄本、台北A抄本源于同一系统,但非直接源于同一底本。四库本以台北A抄本为底本,缺失部分以别本补入,校订工作难称精当。殿本则以某种清初罕见的刻本为底本,进行校订刊刻而成,与三抄本、四库本来自于不同的系统。 “Tang will want” is the earliest history books, is to study the important documents of Tang Dynasty system. For a long time, however, it was mainly circulated in transcripts, with many mistakes. When the Qing court by the four library correction, the formation of four library. Later by the Wu Yingdian periodicals engraved, forming the so-called version of the engraved version of the temple, then into the modern version of this. In this paper, through a comparative analysis of the transcripts of Jing Jia Tang, A and B transcripts stored in Taipei’s National Central Library and the four versions of Sikuen and Emperors, some misunderstandings about the past and future of the Tang Society It was amended to clarify the relationship between the versions. Taipei B transcripts and Jing Jia Tang transcripts, Taipei A transcripts from the same system, but not directly derived from the same base. Si Ku本 to Taipei A transcript as the base, the missing part of the non-supplement, difficult to calibrate the work properly. This version of the temple is based on rare rare books of the early Qing Dynasty, edited and inscribed with three copies and four from the different systems.