论文部分内容阅读
小说与历史的关系历来难分难解,远者不提,单是1949年以来就有革命历史小说、新历史小说、新革命历史小说一波接一波的浪潮滚滚而来,又滚滚而去。历史的神圣面目从铸就到拆解再到否定之否定的重塑,不一而足,在这“正复为邪,善复为妖”的辩证发展中,昔日被宏大叙事组织起来的历史材料和意义结构如风化岩石的碎片,一块块剥落、坍塌下来,其总体面貌和意义早已变得模糊不清,作家要么直截了当地承认:“历史是什么?历史怎样成为历史?我不知道。”(蔡测海《楚傩巴猜
The relationship between novels and history has always been difficult to understand. Far from mentioning, there have been revolutionary historical novels, new historical novels since 1949, wave after wave of new revolutionary historical novels billowed, and billowed away. The sacred aspect of history has gone from casting to dismantling to negating the negation of remodeling. In this dialectical development of “being as evil and rehabilitating as demon,” it was once organized by a grand narrative The historical material and the structure of meaning, such as the fragments of weathered rocks, peeled off and collapsed, the general appearance and meaning of which have become obscure. The writer either bluntly admits: “What is history? How history becomes history? I do not know . ”(Choi measured sea" Chueba guess