论文部分内容阅读
2012年4月,田先生与姜先生就委托合同发生纠纷,田先生向北京市海淀区法院提起诉讼并申请对姜先生名下价值近百万元的财产采取保全措施,其提交了由某担保公司出具的保函作为担保。经审查,海淀区法院认为田先生的申请符合民事诉讼法的相关规定,遂作出财产保全裁定。在执行该裁定的过程中,海淀区法院发现姜先生是某大型煤矿的登记采矿权人,因此向国土资源管理部门发出了协助执行通知书,将该矿的采矿许可证予以冻结,冻结期间
In April 2012, Mr. Tian and Mr. Jiang disagreed on the contract. Mr. Tian filed a lawsuit in Beijing Haidian District Court and applied for the preservation of the property worth nearly one million yuan owned by Mr. Jiang. He submitted a guarantee by a certain guarantee Guarantee issued by the company as a guarantee. Upon examination, Haidian District Court held that Mr. Tian’s application was in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Law and that a property preservation ruling was made. In executing the ruling, Haidian District Court found that Mr. Jiang was a registered mining right owner of a large-scale coal mine and therefore sent a notice of assistance to the land and resources administration department to freeze the mining permit of the mine during the freeze period