论文部分内容阅读
目前,我国很多学术论文的摘要规范程度不高,这在一定程度上将影响论文的被阅读率和被引率。对13种图书馆学核心期刊论文摘要的数量、类型、人称和字数的规范程度进行统计分析:大部分期刊都有随文摘要;指示性摘要和报道性摘要所占比例相当,指示性比例略高;在人称使用方面部分期刊如《图书馆建设》、《国家图书馆学刊》、《图书情报工作》等较为规范,但也有很多期刊表述很不规范;在字数方面,《中国图书馆学报》、《图书馆建设》相对较规范。存在这些问题的主要原因是作者和编辑部对摘要的认识和重视程度不够,应从提高编辑部负责人和编辑的规范意识,加强与作者的沟通,突出创新点,从内容和形式上严格规范等方面进一步规范摘要的撰写。
At present, the abstracts of many academic papers in our country are not normatively regulated to a certain extent, which will affect the reading rate and cited rate of papers. Statistical analysis was conducted on the norms of quantity, type, person and number of abstracts of 13 core journal journals: most journals have abstracts; the proportion of indicative summaries and report summaries is equivalent; High; in the use of personal part of the periodicals such as “library construction”, “National Library Journal”, “Library and Information Work” and other more standardized, but there are many periodicals is not standardized; in terms of words, “Chinese Journal of Library Science ”,“ Library Construction ”is relatively standardized. The main reason for the existence of these problems is that the author and the editorial department do not know enough and pay enough attention to the abstracts. They should improve their normative awareness of editors’ chiefs and editors, enhance their communication with authors, highlight innovation points, and strictly regulate contents and forms Aspects to further standardize the preparation of the summary.