探析杜威与卢卡奇在实践问题上的内在关联——以两者对康德哲学二元论的批判为视角

来源 :当代国外马克思主义评论 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:kakayang
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
卢卡奇和杜威在实践观的问题上虽然没有直接的思想交流,但是两者都是处在德国古典哲学传统之下对康德哲学问题的诊断与克服。卢卡奇和杜威都看到了康德立足于形式主义立场上必然带来各种二元对立和分裂的问题,因为形式主义的发展必然带来对内容的无关紧要。只有恢复实践的基础地位才能找到弥合各种分裂和对立的渠道,主客同一的实践优先于一切人为的区分。源出性的实践不能是抽象的和任意的行为,而必须是基于物质基础之上的辩证的历史实践。 Although there is no direct exchange of ideas between Lukacs and Dewey on the issue of practice, both are diagnosed and overcome Kant’s philosophical problems under the German classical philosophical tradition. Both Lukacs and Dewey have seen that Kant must bring about all kinds of binary opposition and split on the basis of formalism because the development of formalism will inevitably bring about irrelevance to the content. Only by restoring the foundations of practice can we find ways to bridge the various channels of division and opposites. The practice of both subject matter and object takes precedence over all man-made distinctions. Source of practice can not be abstracted and arbitrary behavior, but must be based on the dialectical material basis of historical practice.
其他文献
温馨的、有点潮湿的,南方的夜降落在城市的林梢和屋檐前。一轮新月好像一朵橘子花,宁静地开放在浅蓝色的天空。  城市在闪耀着它的宝石似的光辉,散发肉豆落一般的香味。泉州,你经历过多少风险,珍藏了这样多的珍宝?呵,那林立的碑坊,那雄伟的东塔和西塔,那开元寺紫云大殿后面希腊哥林多式的廊柱雕刻,大殿前面平台基石上古埃及式的人面兽身的浮雕,那以青色花岗石建筑的具有古叙利亚建筑风味的清真寺……它们怎样越过时间的