论文部分内容阅读
定罪制约量刑导致的量刑畸重是不可忽视的重要问题,特殊减轻条款的使用具有局限性,“量刑反制定罪”又违反罪刑法定原则。量刑类推是解决该问题的妥当方式。“白马亦马”决定行为符合A罪不能违背,但倘若行为特征更类似于A的特别法条B罪,可类推适用B罪的法定刑量刑。许霆案可定盗窃罪,类推信用卡诈骗罪(恶意透支)量刑。量刑类推立足类似案件类似处理的正义,应当是坚持罪刑法定原则下,缓解定罪量刑冲突的一剂良方。
Conviction to restrict sentencing caused by abnormal sentencing is an important issue that can not be ignored, the use of special abatement provisions have limitations, “sentencing against crime” and violates the statutory principle of crime and punishment. Sentencing is an appropriate way to solve this problem. “White Horse also Ma ” can not be contrary to A decision to act, but if the behavioral characteristics more similar to A of the special section B crime, analogy can be deduced analogous B crime punishment. Xu Ting case may be theft, analogy credit card fraud (malicious overdraft) sentencing. The establishment of the sentencing analogy to justify the similar handling of similar cases should be a good prescription for alleviating the conflict of conviction and sentencing under the principle of legality.