论文部分内容阅读
本文从研究史的角度对屈原职掌、关系、任职先后等问题予以梳理, 通过传统文献与考古发现互证的方法进一步考释: “左徒”即登徒之说, 仍然是一种推测; 王逸关于“三闾之职, 掌王族三姓, 曰昭、屈、景”的记叙是可信的; 将“左徒”、“三闾大夫”职务职掌的简单等同, 存在着方法论的明显缺憾。王逸关于“三闾大夫”为“故官”之说值得重视, 屈原政治生涯的高峰是任“左徒”之职;短暂的“辉煌”导致了屈原一生巨大的失落; 而“三闾大夫”之职, 则与屈原政治生涯相始终。
From the perspective of the history of the study, this paper reviews Qu Yuan’s work, the relationship and the precedence of serving on the job, and further examines the traditional documents and methods of mutual evidence of archaeological discoveries. The argument that “leftist” is a disciple is still a kind of speculation. Wang Yi The narration of “Sanlu’s post and royal clan’s three surnames, Yue Zhao, Qu, Jing” is credible; there is a clear lack of methodology in the simple equalization of the positions of “Zuoshu” and “Sanlu doctor”. Wang Yi’s “Three Lvu” as “the official” is worthy of attention, Qu Yuan’s political career peak is the “Leftist” post; a brief “brilliant” led to a huge loss of Qu Yuan’s life; and “Sanlu doctor ”Post, and Qu Yuan political career always.