本文认为 ,骚、赋分别为不同的文体 ,不应混为一谈 ,屈原之作不当以赋名之。文章着重从骚、赋产生的历史状况 ,骚、赋体性之差别 ,骚、赋之流变 ,说明二者之不同 ,其中对骚、赋体性之别论述较为具体细微。文章最后对与此相关的几个问题 ,如刘勰、萧统对骚、赋的分辨 ,汉人何以称屈作为赋 ,以及骚体赋进行了简要论述。此文有助于解决对屈原之作称名混乱的状况 This article argues that Sao and Fu are different styles of writing respectively and should not be confused with each other. The article focuses on the differences between the historical conditions of Sao and Fu, the differences of Sao and Fu Xing, the changes of Sao and Fu, and the differences between the two. The dissertations on Sao and Fu Xing are more detailed and subtle. At the end of the article, I give a brief account of several issues related to this, such as Liu Xie’s and Xiao Tong’s discernment of Sao and Fu, Han’s prequel as Fu, and Sao Fu. This article helps to resolve Qu Yuan’s title chaos situation