提供了在生态恢复和流域水文中将水文和生态结合起来研究的方法。模拟流域湿地恢复的潜在效果是基于物理的完全分布式水文模拟,再加上空间分析和湿地景观创建的技术。在过去,发生于流域范围的农业和人类居住等人文活动,使大多数湿地都留下了人工沟渠的痕迹,同时也带来了生态系统的自然功能和人类需求之间的矛盾。很多水生态的研究结果表明,这种人类干预会导致更为极端的水文特性。研究的目标是建立和研究生态恢复的革新方法,了解每种方式潜在的水文影响,分析各种生态恢复方式是否受具体地点、地域分布的影响。用地的改变是基于土地的物理特征,并且考虑用地改变的可信度。研究的重点在于湿地在流域和水文地形中的位置;湿地恢复根据不同的流域设置而制定;区分依赖湿地的地下水和受入流水位和地表水影响的湿地等不同情况。减少流域不透水面积和增加土壤的含水饱和度有利于湿地的恢复。另外,水文模拟用地的分类是最大的歧义。很多用地分类介于二者之间,而不单独适合任何一种地图分类中的类别。湿地的地面覆盖常被分为草地、落叶森林或者开放水域。如何处理湿地类型的多样性,并且协调它们在具体模型中的水文行为呢?这些都会在西欧(比利时)大内特河(Grote Nete)流域实例中以一种更大的视角展示。 Provides a way to study the combination of hydrology and ecology in ecosystem restoration and basin hydrology. The potential effect of simulated wetland restoration is physically based, fully distributed hydrological modeling, coupled with spatial analysis and wetland landscape creation techniques. In the past, cultural activities such as agriculture and human settlements that occurred in catchment areas left traces of artificial ditches in most wetlands, and brought about the contradiction between the natural functions of ecosystems and human needs. Many aquatic findings suggest that such human intervention can lead to more extreme hydrological characteristics. The objective of the study is to establish and study innovative approaches to ecological restoration, to understand the potential hydrological impacts of each approach, and to analyze whether various approaches to ecological restoration are affected by specific locations and geographical distributions. The change of land use is based on the physical characteristics of the land, and the credibility of land use change is taken into account. The focus of the study is on the location of wetlands in watersheds and hydrographic terrain; restoration of wetlands is based on different basin settings; and groundwater that depends on wetlands and wetlands that are affected by inflow levels and surface water are identified. Reduce the impervious area and increase the water saturation of the soil is conducive to the recovery of wetlands. In addition, hydrological simulation of land use classification is the biggest ambiguity. Much of the land-use classification falls between the two and does not fit into any of the categories in any of the map categories. Wetland ground cover is often divided into grassland, deciduous forest or open water. How to deal with the diversity of wetland types and to coordinate their hydrological behavior in specific models? These are all presented in a larger perspective in the case of the Grote Nete basin in Western Europe (Belgium).