论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析为使用IUD(宫内节育器)避孕的患者采用多功能取环钳与传统取环钩进行取环的临床效果。方法:对2012年6月~2014年12月期间在我院进行取环(避孕环)的400例女性相关的临床资料进行回顾性研究。将这400例女性随机分为对照组和研究组,每组各有200例女性。我院为对照组女性采用传统的取环钩进行取环,为研究组女性采用多功能取环钳进行取环。然后对比两组女性取环的时间、术中的出血量、疼痛的评分以及取环的效果。结果 :研究组女性取环的时间明显短于对照组女性,其术中的出血量和疼痛的评分均明显少于对照组女性,二者相比差异具有显著性(t=6.42,P<0.05)。研究组女性取环的总有效率为98.5%,对照组女性取环的总有效率为96.0%。研究组女性者取环的总有效率明显高于对照组女性,二者相比差异具有显著性(5%,可有效地缩短其取环的时间,减少其术中的出血量,降低其疼痛感,提高其取环的效果。此疗法值得在临床上推广应用。
OBJECTIVE: To comparatively analyze the clinical effect of using multi-function forceps and traditional hook to take the ring for patients using IUD (intrauterine device) contraception. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 400 women who underwent ring (IUD) in our hospital from June 2012 to December 2014. The 400 women were randomly divided into control group and study group, each with 200 women. In our hospital, women in the control group took the traditional ring hooks, and adopted the multi-function ring-pliers for the study group. Then compare the two groups of women taking the ring time, intraoperative bleeding, pain score and the effect of taking the ring. Results: Women in study group were significantly shorter than those in control group. The bleeding volume and pain score in operation group were significantly less than those in control group, the difference was significant (t = 6.42, P <0.05 ). In the study group, the total effective rate of taking the ring in the female was 98.5% and in the control group, the total effective rate of taking the ring in the female was 96.0%. The total effective rate of female patients in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group, the difference was significant (5%), which can shorten the time of taking the ring, reduce the intraoperative blood loss and reduce the pain Sense, improve the effect of taking its ring.This therapy deserves to be clinically applied.