论文部分内容阅读
卢梭与老庄都对当时的社会现实进行了尖锐的批判,也各自提出了疗救现实的办法。卢梭指出人类应该以自然的美好来清除“文明”的罪恶,回到“自然状态”。老庄主张退回“小国寡民”、“至德之世”,以主观的心灵省悟,构筑自由的精神家园。道家怀持“无为”,立足于精神的救赎,提倡消饵欲望,达到超然物外的精神境界。卢梭则致力于人类“未来”自由幸福的达成,认为通过社会革命和教育改革,可以达到理想的社会。
Both Rousseau and Laozhuang criticized the social reality at that time sharply, and also proposed the ways to cure the reality. Rousseau pointed out that mankind should remove the evil of “civilization” with natural beauty and return to the “natural state.” Laozhuang advocated returning the “small country with a few people”, “the world of morality”, subjective understanding of the soul, to build a free spiritual home. Taoists cherish the “Inaction”, based on the spirit of salvation, advocate the desire to eliminate bait, reach the spiritual realm of detached things. Rousseau is committed to the realization of the “future” of mankind free and happy, that through social revolution and education reform, can achieve the desired society.