论文部分内容阅读
讯问笔录不属于刑事诉讼中法定的证据种类,而民事诉讼中当事人以刑事讯问笔录作为证据使用的现象又屡见不鲜。证据法对此近乎空白的立法现状,使讯问笔录在民事诉讼中的证据能力就成了普遍的问题。讯问笔录在民事诉讼中一直被“身份不明”的使用,那么应当如何看待讯问笔录在民事诉讼中的证据效力呢?本文中将以在刑事诉讼中具有证据能力的讯问笔录为前提,分析讯问笔录在民事诉讼中的证据能力。
Interrogation transcripts do not belong to the type of legal evidence in criminal proceedings, and it is not uncommon for parties to use transcripts of criminal interrogations as evidence. The almost blank legislation status of evidence law has made interrogation of evidence in civil litigation a common problem. The transcripts of transcripts of interrogation in civil litigation have been used by “unidentified ones”, so how should the evidence validity of interrogation transcripts in civil litigation be judged? In this paper, interrogation transcripts with evidence ability in criminal litigation will be taken as the premise, Interrogation of evidence in evidence in civil proceedings.