目次一、前言二、实体法依据(一)GATT第24条和关于解释GATT第24条的谅解(二)GATT第13条(三)GATT第6条和关于实施GATT第6条的协定(即反倾销协定(四)GATS第5条三、程序法依据(一)GATT第28条和关于解释GATT第28条的谅解(二)GATS第21条和GATS第21条实施程序四、回顾与欧盟补偿谈判历程(一)欧盟1995年扩大(二)欧盟2004年扩大五、从谈判的视角看世贸组织现行法律机制的特点(一)多边层面审查机制虽有改善,但对关税同盟缺乏约束力(二)双边谈判中,实力仍起决定性作用,同时需要注重谈判策略 I. INTRODUCTION II. Substantive Law Basis (a) Article 24 of the GATT and Understanding on the Interpretation of Article 24 of the GATT (ii) Article 13 (3) of the GATT Article 6 of the GATT and the Agreement concerning the Implementation of Article 6 of the GATT Anti-Dumping Agreement (IV) Article 5 of the GATS III. Procedural Law Basis (a) Article 28 of the GATT and Understanding on the Interpretation of Article 28 of the GATT (ii) Article 21 of the GATS and Article 21 of the GATS Implementing Procedures IV. Reviewing the EU Compensation Negotiation Process (1) EU Enlargement in 1995 (2) EU Enlargement in 2004 (5) Features of the WTO’s Current Legal Mechanism from a Negotiating Perspective (1) Although the review mechanism at the multilateral level has been improved, it is not binding on the Customs Union ) In bilateral negotiations, strength still plays a decisive role, and at the same time it needs to focus on negotiation strategies