法律决定的证成是裁判者的必然义务,而合规范性是其中的核心要求。严格的合规范性主张,随着无漏洞的法律公理体系之梦的破灭而无法维系。对于合规范性,哈特与德沃金给出了不同理解:前者区分了规范识别与规范适用,后者强调了理论争议与法律的论证性特征。实际上,法律决定的合规范性是一个弹性问题:规范识别解决的是框架问题;在框架内,个案 Proof of legal decision is the inevitable obligation of the judge, and compliance is one of the core requirements. Strict compliance with normative propositions, with the flaw of the flawless legal axiom of the system can not be maintained. For compliance, Hart and Dworkin gave different understandings: the former distinguishes between normative identification and normative application, and the latter emphasizes the theoretical controversy and the argumentation of law. In fact, the normative compliance of the law is a matter of elasticity: normative identification addresses the framework issue; within the framework, cases