论文部分内容阅读
凯洛案后美国联邦和州层面的新立法对于土地征收权的动用施加更多限制的同时,也规定了很多例外的情形,对于“公共使用”涵义的解读要想回归到狭义的、语义学上的原点几乎是不可能的,为了特定的经济发展目的而动用土地征收权还是有相当市场的。如果将新立法中体现的优先权制度、额外补偿制度、综合规划制度、公益与私益权衡制度与特定的经济发展目的结合起来考量的话,土地征收权动用范围的适度扩大就多了更多的合理性基础。
The new legislation at the federal and state levels in the United States after the case of Kellogg imposes more restrictions on the use of the land expropriation right. At the same time, it also stipulates many exceptions. The interpretation of the meaning of “public use” is intended to return to the narrow sense. It is almost impossible to semantically find the origin. There is still a considerable market for using land acquisition rights for specific economic development. Considering the priority system, extra compensation system, comprehensive planning system, public-private equity system and specific economic development objectives embodied in the new legislation, the reasonable expansion of the scope of the acquisition of land will be more reasonable Sexual foundation.