论文部分内容阅读
本文以北京师范大学出版社高中《数学1(必修)》、人民教育出版社高中《数学1(必修)A版》教科书函数概念一节内容为研究对象,从“与学生的交流”和“对学生的要求”两个维度比较分析.研究发现:人教版函数概念范例呈现讲究实效,方便自学,北师大版教材范例呈现讲究点到为止的启发式学习,适合探究式合作学习;人教版教材问题数量是北师大版的2倍多,但人教版整体问题综合难度偏低.
This article takes Beijing Normal University Press high school mathematics 1 (compulsory), People’s Education Press high school mathematics 1 (compulsory) version A textbook function concept section as the research object, from “and student exchange ” and “The requirement of students ” comparative analysis of two dimensions.The study found that: PEP paradigm paradigm exemplifies the effectiveness of practical examples to facilitate self-study, Beijing Normal University version of textbook examples of attention to the point of heuristic learning, suitable for inquiry-based cooperation Learning; People’s Education Edition teaching materials the number of problems is more than 2 times the Beijing Normal University, but the overall difficulty of PEP general low degree of integration.