论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析改良根治术与保乳手术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的临床疗效。方法:选取我院收治的早期乳腺癌患者78例,采用随机分组法进行分组,分为对照组39例和观察组39例,采用改良根治术对对照组患者进行治疗,采用保乳术对观察组进行治疗,将两组的临床疗效进行对比。结果:观察组、对照组的手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度以及住院时间相比,差异存在显著性(P<0.05);在乳房美容效果的比较中,观察组、对照组的美容优良率分别为87.18%(34/39)、64.10%(25/39),两组对比可见,观察组明显高于对照组,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论:采用保乳术对早期乳腺癌患者进行治疗,临床疗效较改良根治术优,且美容效果更为理想,具有推广的价值。
Objective: To compare the clinical curative effect of modified radical mastectomy and breast conserving surgery in the treatment of early breast cancer. Methods: A total of 78 early breast cancer patients admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into control group (39 cases) and observation group (39 cases). The patients in the control group were treated by modified radical mastectomy. Group for treatment, the clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared. Results: There were significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length and length of hospital stay between the observation group and the control group (P <0.05). In the comparison of breast cosmetic results, the beauty of the observation group and the control group was excellent The rates were 87.18% (34/39) and 64.10% (25/39), respectively. The comparison between the two groups showed that the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: The use of breast-conserving surgery in patients with early breast cancer, the clinical curative effect is better than modified radical mastectomy, and the cosmetic effect is more ideal, with the promotion of value.