论文部分内容阅读
中国药学大辞典的编写方法是不严肃的、不负责任的。在序言及例言中说,曾用参考书二百余种,又说“搜集古今药学、医学、植物学、矿物学、动物学及化学之关于中国药学材料,用科学方法加以整理”,但事实上,只是将本草纲目、纲目拾遗、植物名实图考、植物学大词典、动物学大词典及和汉药考等几部书拆开剪贴而成。并且还有时“画蛇添足”“好肉生疮”地造成错误。编辞典而采用剪贴方法也不一定很坏,坏的是编者对于所有材料不但没有用过“科学方法”,并且也没有用过普通审较的方法好好整理,因之就不免张冠李戴,错误百出了。综观中国药学大辞典的错误,有下列几种:
The preparation of the Chinese Pharmacy Dictionary is not serious and irresponsible. In the preface and the introduction, it was stated that more than 200 reference books were used, and that “collections of ancient and modern pharmacy, medicine, botany, mineralogy, zoology, and chemistry are related to Chinese pharmacy materials and are collated with scientific methods”, but In fact, it was only the scrapbooking of several books, including the compilation of the Compendium of Materia Medica, the outline of the program, the survey of plant names, the dictionary of botany, the dictionary of zoology, and the Chinese medicine examination. And there are times when “adding a good enough snake” and “a good sore” cause mistakes. The use of cutting-edge methods in editing the dictionary is not necessarily bad. The bad thing is that the editor has not used any “scientific method” for all materials, and he has not used ordinary methods of review to properly organize. Therefore, it is inevitable that Zhang Guan and Li Dai are mistaken. . Looking at the errors in the Chinese Pharmaceutical Dictionary, there are the following: