论文部分内容阅读
字义解释应以语词的惯习语义为其约束性边界。它不同于语词的本质语义,后者以某种本体性存在为预设追求真义,但该预设存在缺陷。它亦不同于语用意义,后者的运用将导向非基于语义内涵的意义探求,它们皆难以作为字义解释的界限。基于立法权威与技术理性之追求,言说者意义与体系性概念可优先于惯习语义,但后者的独特价值也不能因此而被忽视。
The sense of meaning should be bound by the semantic meaning of words. It is different from the essential semantics of words, which pursue the true meaning by some kind of ontological existence, but the default is flawed. It is also different from the pragmatic meaning, the latter will be oriented to explore the meaning of non-semantic content, they are difficult to interpret the boundaries of meaning. Based on the pursuit of legislative authority and technical rationality, the speaker’s meaning and systematic concept may take precedence over the habitual semantics, but the latter’s unique value can not be neglected.