美国学者顾明栋的《汉学主义》一书自问世以来,在赢得国内外许多学者赞同褒扬的同时,也受到一些学者的批评和质疑。少数学者认为“汉学主义”是东方主义的翻版,在研究范式上存在缺陷,并不能超越和替代东方主义和后殖民理论。本文认为该书在研究领域、研究视角、研究范式、研究思想和宗旨上都与东方主义和后殖民主义有明显区分,具备独立价值和新建范式,虽未臻完美,但不失为一部具有探索性和创新性的跨文化研究力作。 Since the advent of American scholar Gu Mingdong’s “Sinology”, many scholars at home and abroad have won praise for it and criticized and questioned by some scholars. Few scholars believe that “Sinology” is a revision of Orientalism and has defects in the research paradigm and can not transcend and replace the theories of orientalism and post-colonialism. This paper argues that the book has clear distinction between Orientalism and post-colonialism in the field of study, research perspective, research paradigm, research thought and purpose, with independent value and new paradigm. Although not perfect, it is an exploratory And innovative cross-cultural research masterpiece.