论文部分内容阅读
2015年9月6日,似乎渐渐隐去的南京宝马案又起波澜,南京交警发布消息称,南京脑科医院司法鉴定所为犯罪嫌疑人出具了一份“其作案时患有急性短暂性精神障碍,有限制刑事责任能力”的司法鉴定意见书。也就是说,此鉴定意见可能影响量刑。一时间,舆论哗然。“急性短暂性精神障碍”是个什么鬼?它为什么能影响量刑?此案暴露的这些问题与曾经轰动世界的约翰·辛克利行刺美国总统里根案有很多相似之处。他山之石或许会给我们带来一些解决类似问题的全新思考。但有一点是毫无疑问的,那就是犯了法律,不管以什么方式进行惩罚,当事人都是要承担责任的。
September 6, 2015, seems to be gradually disappearing Nanjing case of another upsurge in Nanjing, Nanjing traffic police said in a press release, Nanjing Brain Hospital forensic institute for the suspects issued a copy of the “Acute transient when committing the crime Mentally handicapped, limited criminal responsibility ”of the forensic opinion. In other words, this identification opinion may affect sentencing. For a time, public opinion uproar. Why is it affecting sentencing? The issues exposed in the case have many similarities to John Sinclair’s assassination of the U.S. President Reagan case in the wake of the sensation of the world. Stones from other hills may give us new ideas for solving similar problems. However, there is no doubt that there is no doubt that the law has been broken and the parties have to assume the responsibility no matter what the punishment is.