论文部分内容阅读
萨特与梅洛-庞蒂之争表面上是因为政治原因,实际上却是两人对于哲学本身的不同思考和不同选择所致。萨特的政治介入因其政治层面的清晰单一,从而丧失了哲学层面的丰富性,这是梅洛-庞蒂与之决裂的主要原因。同时,他们二人的争论亦可看作韦伯式的马克思主义与存在主义的马克思主义之间的一次交手。这场争论对萨特刺激很大,以致他在撰写《辩证理性批判》时,一定程度上调整和修正了以往的激进姿态和观点。
The dispute between Sartre and Merleau-Ponty was ostensibly for political reasons, but actually caused by two different thinking and different choices about philosophy itself. Sartre’s political involvement because of its political unity of a single, thus losing the philosophical level of richness, which is Melo - Ponty with the main reason for the split. At the same time, the debate between the two of them can also be seen as a battle between Weber’s Marxism and existential Marxism. The controversy so greatly stimulated Sartre that when he wrote The Critique of Dialectical Reason, he adjusted and amends the previous radical gestures and opinions to some extent.