论文部分内容阅读
《侵权责任法》第87条规定的加害人不明时损失分担规则是我国法的一大创造,在世界各国立法例中罕见,在学术界曾经引发过巨大争议。对现有案例的分析已经证明,法官对该规则的理解不一,有扩大和类推适用倾向。因此,在司法实践中,应当对该条在目的上、对象上、内容上和范围上予以限缩,以最大限度地避免该条引发的负面影响,并达到从解释论的角度改良该条之目的。
The loss-sharing rules stipulated in Article 87 of the Tort Liability Act, which is a major creation of our law, are rare in the legislation of all countries in the world and have caused great controversy in academia. Analysis of the existing cases has shown that judges have different interpretations of the rules, and have tended to expand and analogize them. Therefore, in judicial practice, the article should be narrowed in purpose, object, content and scope in order to avoid the negative influence caused by the article to the maximum extent and to improve the article from the angle of interpretation theory purpose.