论文部分内容阅读
柏格森和沙特的哲学在形而上学和本体论的定义上分道扬镳,因而这两派哲学提出了两个问题:意识是不是心灵的全部或存在的本来的缺乏?意识是不是一切形而上学的基础抑或是一门虚无本体论的起点?I柏格森和沙特否认意识有可能成为自身的内容的那种假定(因为它并不是如此),他们也反对这样一种观念即意识只能是附带地成为自我意识的那种想法,因为唯有在内容是独立的假定里意识才可以分化成偶尔自觉的意识和枝节地明朗自我意识;如
The philosophy of Bergson and Saudi parted ways in the definition of metaphysics and ontology. Therefore, these two schools of philosophy proposed two questions: Is consciousness the original lack of all or existence of mind? Is consciousness the basis of all metaphysics or A starting point for a void and ontological theory. I Bergson and Saudi denied the assumption that consciousness might be its own content (because it does not), and they reject the notion that consciousness can only incidentally become self Consciousness of consciousness, because only in the content is independent of the assumption of consciousness can be differentiated into the consciousness of the occasional conscious and steadfast self-awareness;