论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨热必清颗粒灌肠和口服两种不同给药途径治疗小儿上呼吸道感染发热的临床疗效。方法 200例上呼吸道感染发热患儿,分为对照组和治疗组,对照组95例,治疗组105例。在常规住院治疗基础上通过不同给药途径,对两组患儿退热时间及退热效果进行比较分析,同时观察两组患儿的不良反应。结果治疗组的降温速度及总有效率相较于对照组均有明显优势,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论对于上呼吸道感染引起发热的患儿采用热必清颗粒灌肠的给药方式作用明显,降温迅速,不良反应较小,值得引起广大临床医师的重视及推广应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of heat-clearing granule enema and oral administration of two different routes of administration on fever in children with upper respiratory tract infection. Methods 200 cases of upper respiratory tract infection in children with fever, divided into control group and treatment group, control group of 95 cases, the treatment group of 105 cases. On the basis of routine hospitalization, the antipyretic time and antipyretic effect of two groups of children were compared by different route of administration, and the adverse reactions of the two groups were observed. Results Compared with the control group, the cooling rate and total effective rate in the treatment group were significantly superior (P <0.01). Conclusion For children with fever caused by upper respiratory tract infection, heat-clearing granule enema is effective in the mode of administration, with rapid cooling and small adverse reactions, which deserves the attention and promotion of the majority of clinicians.