论文部分内容阅读
基于对“构成要件符合性”的理解不同,学界形成了限制正犯概念与扩张正犯概念两种对立的基本立场,构建了不同的犯罪参与论体系;以犯罪事实支配论为理论基础,间接正犯概念得以摆脱“替补性”的地位,但是此一概念的存在,却使通说建构犯罪参与论体系的前提面临崩溃的边缘,逻辑立场的一致性丧失殆尽;不论我国刑法关于共犯的立法模式是倾向于区分制还是单一制,在限制正犯体系与扩张正犯体系之下都不应有间接正犯概念的存在。
Based on the different comprehension of the connotation of “constitutional elements ”, the academic circle has formed two kinds of contradictory basic positions that restrict the concept of the principal offender and the concept of expanding the principal offender, and constructed different systems of crime participation theory. Based on the theory of criminal fact domination, However, the existence of this concept has made the premise of building a system of criminal participation at the brink of collapse and the consistency of the logical position has been lost. No matter whether the concept of accomplice The legislative model tends to be differentiated or unitary and there should be no indirect concept of positive criminality under the system of restricting the principal offender and expanding the system of the principal offender.