论文部分内容阅读
修辞学界一般认为同类事物本质相同,不能构成比喻,但用这一观点指导修辞教学,对一些语句不能很好地解释,而且实际语言中也有大量的同类设喻的比喻句存在,所以我们从认知的角度对同类构成比喻的问题试作解释,发现同一范畴的成员之间(本质相同的事物)可以构成比喻,构成的条件是:同一范畴的成员之间的认知距离较大;范畴的部分成员的次原型作喻体,部分成员作本体。
Rhetoric scholars generally believe that the same kind of things are essentially the same, can not constitute a metaphor, but using this view to guide rhetorical teaching can not be a good explanation for some of the sentences, and the actual language also has a large number of metaphorical similar metaphorical existence, so we recognize From the angle of knowing, try to explain the problems of the analogy of the similar composition, and find that the same category of members (the same thing in essence) can constitute a metaphor, the conditions are as follows: the cognition distance among the members of the same category is large; Some members of the sub-prototype for the metaphor, some members as the body.