论文部分内容阅读
一般来说,凡使用《中图法》第三版（以下简称“第三版”）的图书馆和情报部门都面临着馆藏图书和目录局部改编这一现实问题,究竟选择何种方法才更科学、更实用?通常不外乎以下4种方法:（1）图书和目录彻底改编法;（2）“一刀切”法;（3）目录改组法;（4）细目录粗排架的改编方法。 一、常用改编方法的优缺点浅析 1. 图书和目录彻底改编法:即分类目录和藏书排架全部按第三版要求进行改编。其优点是能保证新、旧分类体系高度统一,对于中小型图书馆来讲,这是一种最理想的做法。其缺点是改编工作量大,人力、财力等较难落实,还容易影响读者借阅。
Generally speaking, all libraries and intelligence agencies that use the third edition of the Chinese Library Classification (CEPA) are facing the real problem of local adaptation of collections of books and catalogs Science, more practical? Usually nothing more than the following four methods: (1) books and directories completely adapted; (2) “one size fits all” method; (3) directory restructuring method; (4) . First, the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used methods of adaptation 1. Book and directory completely adapted method: that is, the classification of the directory and the collection of books all the requirements of the third edition adaptation. Its advantage is to ensure that new and old classification system highly uniform, for small and medium-sized libraries, this is a best practice. The disadvantage is the large amount of adaptation work, human, financial and other more difficult to implement, but also easily affect the reader to borrow.