论文部分内容阅读
市场竞争中,垄断者作为一种特殊民事法律关系主体,其民事权利是否应受到限缩,是《反垄断法》需要关注的一个问题。文章以奇虎诉腾讯案为例,在假设的基础上对垄断者实施私力救济的民事权利进行分析,并对其利用垄断地位进行私力救济的合理性、合法性以及应受的限制进行判断。最后在厘清垄断行为与私力救济关系的基础上,从立法内容和形式的角度出发,探究法律应如何规制利用垄断地位进行私力救济的行为。
In the market competition, the monopolist, as the subject of a special civil law relationship, should limit its civil rights to the limits of the civil rights, which is a problem to be paid attention to in the AML. Taking Qihoo v. Tencent case as an example, this article analyzes the civil rights of monopolies for private remedies on the basis of hypotheses, and makes a judgment on the rationality and validity of the monopoly for private remedies. . Finally, on the basis of clarifying the relationship between monopolistic behavior and self-help remedy, from the perspective of the content and form of legislation, this paper explores how the law should regulate the use of monopoly status for private remedy.