在《谈“互补原理”在历史研究中的运用》一文中,笔者曾就丹麦物理学家玻尔提出的“互补原理”,从五个方面探讨了它在历史研究中的运用问题。因为此文主要谈了这个原理在历史研究中的运用,未着重探讨原理本身的认识论价值,发表后一些同志来信提出了不少这方面的问题。“互补原理”在认识论上到底有什么意义和价值,这是一个需要深入研究探讨的问题,我现在仅提出一些不成熟的看法,供大家进一步研究参考。一“互补原理”的特征及其在历史研究中的表现玻尔认为他的“互补原理”受到了中国占代阴 In his article “On the Application of Complementary Principle” in Historical Studies, the author once discussed the application of the principle of complementarity proposed by the Danish physicist Bohr from five aspects in its historical research. Because this article mainly talks about the application of this principle in historical research, it does not focus on the epistemological value of the principle itself. After the publication of some letters from comrades, many problems in this respect were raised. What is the significance and value of “Complementarity Principle” in epistemology? This is a question that needs further study. I just put forward some immature opinions for further study and reference. A “principle of complementarity” and its performance in historical studies Bohr considered his “principle of complementarity”