论文部分内容阅读
侦查主体的“权利告知义务”与被追诉人的“知之权利”相辅相成。它不仅是被追诉人组织有效辩护的制度前提,也是侦查程序法治化的重要表征。在法治发达国家中,侦查权利告知机制的法律效力主要依靠非法证据排除规则来支撑和维系,并形成一套相对合理的规则体系。在我国,侦查机关不仅不负有告知义务,还经常侵犯被追诉人的基本权利。为摆脱被追诉人权利配置的畸形现状,我国刑诉法修改应当对权利告知机制给予重视,构筑一套相对完备的权利告知体系及相应的程序运作机制。
The investigating subject’s “right to inform duty” and the accused’s “right to know” complement each other. It is not only an institutional prerequisite for the defendant to organize an effective defense, but also an important manifestation of the rule of law in the investigation proceedings. In the developed countries under the rule of law, the legal effect of the mechanism of investigating the right to inform mainly depends on the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence to support and maintain a system of rules that is relatively reasonable. In our country, the investigation organ not only does not bear the obligation of informing, but often violates the basic rights of the accused person. In order to get rid of the malformed status of the accused’s rights allocation, the modification of criminal procedure law in our country should pay more attention to the mechanism of right notification, and construct a relatively complete right informing system and corresponding procedure operating mechanism.