论文部分内容阅读
作为一种研究范式,中国民俗志已经有了多种尝试,并开始注重文艺创作始终力图再现的生命经验和个体感受。裸写的《乡村医生·父亲:乡村医患关系的变迁(1985-2010)》给民俗志提供了一个化理论思考于无形的个案。它在事实与理论、观点与资料、理智与情感之间的取舍也成为绑在民俗志潘多拉盒子上的导火线。当越来越多的大众读物都声情并茂地书写着生命经验,难逃有机知识分子尴尬位置的民俗学者不得不在学术圈、田野、民间的转换中,直面“平民”、“人道”这些模糊而危险的概念。在阐释学与资料学、学者与民众、人道与自私的裂缝间,关注现代性的都市民俗志也就具有了实验性与可能性。进一步,正常与不正常也应该是民俗学关注的基本问题。
As a kind of research paradigm, Chinese Folklore has made many attempts and started to pay attention to the life experiences and individual feelings that the literary and artistic creation tries to reproduce. Barely written “Doctor of the Country: Father: Changes in Rural Doctor-patient Relations (1985-2010)” provided a folklore book with an invisible case for the theory of chemistry. Its trade-off between facts and theories, ideas and information, reason and emotion has also become a fuse tied to the box of folklore Pandora. As more and more popular books are written with rich and vivid experiences of life, folklorists who have not escaped the awkward position of organic intellectuals have to confront “civilians”, “humanity” in academic circles, fields and civil transitions "These vague and dangerous concept. In the hermeneutics and data science, scholars and the public, the cracks between humanity and selfishness, attention to the modern urban custom book also has the experimental and possibility. Further, normality and irregularity should also be the basic issues of folklore concern.