论文部分内容阅读
刑事案件对被害人的侵权申请民事赔偿与当事人和解程序之间并没有本质的区别。我国现行的刑事案件审判过程中,都纷纷引入了民事赔偿与和解程序。我国现行2012年《刑事诉讼法》修正草案以及《刑诉法司法解释》对附带民事赔偿案件作出了更加详尽的规定。此外,现行的《刑事诉讼法》还增加了当事人和解程序。因附带民事赔偿与当事人和解都包含了一定民事经济赔付的行为,故两者之间存在相同点。但本质上两者又截然不同,本文旨在对两者的赔偿性质、范围、程序以及在司法实践中实际解决方法作初步探讨。
There is no essential difference between the criminal case applying for civil compensation to the victim’s infringement and the parties’ settlement procedure. During the trial of criminal cases in our country, all of them have introduced civil compensation and reconciliation procedures. China’s current 2012 “Criminal Procedure Law,” the draft amendment and “Criminal Procedure Law Judicial Interpretation,” with civil compensation cases made more detailed provisions. In addition, the existing Code of Criminal Procedure has also added procedural procedures for settling parties. Because of the civil compensation and the parties involved in the settlement contains a certain civil compensation behavior, so the two exist in common. But in essence, the two are very different. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the nature, scope and procedure of the compensation and the practical solutions in judicial practice.