论文部分内容阅读
前些年,被告山西省离石县公安局在侦查一起案件中,以原告陈迎春为一份匿名打印件的重大作案嫌疑人为由,决定对其收容审查。3月11日上午9时许,原告在吕梁地区工业局打字室上班时,被告所属工作人员身着便服,未办理任何法律手续,将原告诱离工作岗位后,强行押至离石县信义派出所,让原告在一张传唤证上签名。3月12日,被告又让原告在3月10日填写的《收容审查通知书》上签名。3月14日下午6时许,被告才将《对被收容审查人家属通知书》送达原告的父亲。在收容审查期间,被告所属工作人员就匿名打印件是谁打印一事,多次讯问原告,原告均予以否认,并提出此件
In previous years, the defendant Lishishi County Public Security Bureau of Shanxi Province investigated a case on the ground that the plaintiff Chen Yingchun was an anonymous printed version of the major criminal suspects, and decided to review his acceptance. At 9:00 on March 11, when the plaintiff went to work in the typing room of the Industrial Bureau of Luliang Prefecture, the staff member of the defendant was wearing casual clothes and did not go through any legal formalities. After the plaintiff lured out of his post, he was forcibly detained at the Lutheran Xinyi Police Station , Let the plaintiff sign a card. On March 12, the defendant also asked the plaintiff to sign the Acceptance Notice on March 10. At 14 o’clock on the 14th of March, the defendant delivered the “Notice to the Family Members of the Examined Persons” to the plaintiff’s father. During the period of the acceptance review, the staff member to whom the defendant filed anonymity print, who repeatedly interrogated the plaintiff and the plaintiff denied it and proposed this