论文部分内容阅读
在《中国书法》杂志去年第二期上刊出的马啸先生一文中,将甘肃省悬泉置遗址出土古纸中有27个楷书字迹的一片残纸遽断为“王莽残纸”。作者进而据此不仅再次提出所谓“西汉已有植物纤维纸”说,并且提出了楷书形成于魏晋时期的历史定论也应重新改写。在历史、教育、文物及书学等各界引起强烈反响。 上海书画出版界的潘德熙先生也对马啸先生论点提出疑议。从书法史角度,结合有关书法的历史真迹分析对比,认为所谓的“王莽残纸”应属魏晋时期之纸。现予刊出,以飨读者。
In the article entitled “Chinese Calligraphy” published in the second issue of last year, Mr. Ma Xiao, a piece of ancient paper in Gansu Province, unearthed in ancient script 27 pieces of regular paper cut off as “Wang Mang residue paper.” The author accordingly not only once again put forward the so-called “Western Han Dynasty plant fiber paper,” said, and put forward the regular script formed in the Wei and Jin Dynasties of historical determinations should be rewritten. In history, education, heritage and books aroused strong repercussions. Mr. Pan Dexi from Shanghai's painting and calligraphy industry also raised the issue of Mr. Ma Xiao's argument. From the perspective of the history of calligraphy, combined with the analysis of the historical authenticity of calligraphy, the so-called “Wang Mang residue paper” should belong to the Wei and Jin period paper. Now published to readers.