我国民事审判方式的改革使举证原则已由法院职权主义逐步向当事人主义转变,从各地审理民事案件的情况为看,基本上都是由当事人或其所委托的律师自行收集证据,这必然导致律师代理业务中调查取证的工作量大为增加。如果举证不能或举证不充分,则可能导致败诉的结果。由此就对律师取证的效力提出了更高的要求。可见,如何提高律师取证的效力,或者说,如何完善保全证据的法律途径,已经是摆在律师界、公证界面前的一个共同课 The reform of civil trial methods in our country has changed the principle of proof from the court of power to the doctrine of change gradually. Judging from the cases of civil cases around the world, evidences are basically collected by the parties or the lawyers entrusted by the parties themselves, Agency business in the investigation and evidence collection workload greatly increased. If the burden of proof or inadequate proof, it may lead to the outcome of the loss. Thus the effectiveness of lawyers forensic put forward higher requirements. Visible, how to enhance the effectiveness of lawyer’s evidence, or how to improve the legal ways to preserve evidence, is already in lawyers, notarized interface before a common class