论文部分内容阅读
由新古典经济学和规范决策理论可知,沉淀成本已经支付了,因其不构成机会成本,所以它不应该影响当前或未来决策,体现沉淀成本决策不相关。然而,由于沉淀成本决策不相关的假设前提十分苛刻,所以,在经济体制转型时期,因有限理性、市场不完全或者委托代理等原因,沉淀成本十分普遍,决策者往往考虑过去发生的沉淀成本,从而出现沉淀成本决策相关性问题。因此,一方面,我们需要承认经济体制转型时期沉淀成本问题的存在;另一方面,需要采取恰当的非正式和正式制度克服沉淀成本负面效应,以及加强沉淀成本管理,从而加速经济体制转型,这对于构建中国特色的社会主义市场经济体制十分重要,从而可以预测经济体制动态演化背后的经济逻辑和一般规律,为经济转型再次进行微观经济分析提供一种新的分析方法。
From the neoclassical economics and normative decision theory, precipitation costs have been paid, because it does not constitute a chance cost, so it should not affect the current or future decision-making, reflecting the irrelevant decision-making costs of sedimentation. However, since the premise of the irrelevant sedimentation cost decision is very harsh, the cost of sedimentation is very common due to limited rationality, imperfect market, or agency by proxy during the period of economic restructuring. Policymakers often consider the cost of sedimentation in the past, Thus the problem of settling cost decision making arises. Therefore, on the one hand, we need to recognize the existence of settling costs during the economic transition; on the other, we need to adopt appropriate informal and formal systems to overcome the negative effects of settling costs and to strengthen the management of sedimentation costs so as to speed up the economic restructuring. It is very important for building a socialist market economic system with Chinese characteristics so that the economic logic and general laws behind the dynamic evolution of the economic system can be predicted and a new analytical method can be provided for the micro-economic analysis of economic restructuring once again.