在关于中国近代史基本线索问题的讨论中,一种有代表性的观点认为,“两个过程”是毛泽东同志对近代史基本线索最重要、最完整、最确当的概括,全部“近代史的重要内容”“在历史发展过程中都包括在‘两个过程’的范围之内,都是可以用‘两个过程’论的思想来加以解释的”;因此,必须坚持以“两个过程”而不是其他意见作近代史的基本线索。对此,笔者有两点不同的看法。第一点,笔者认为毛泽东同志并未用“两个过程”来概括中国近代史的基本线索。所谓“两个过程”,是从《中国革命和中国共产党》一文(以下简称原文)中的这样一段话概括出来的:“帝国主义和中国封建主义相结合,把中国变为半殖民地和殖民地的过程, In the discussion on the basic clues of modern Chinese history, a representative point of view holds that “the two processes” are the most important, complete and most accurate generalizations of the basic clues to modern history by Comrade Mao Tse-tung, and all of the “modern history The important content ”“ is included within the scope of the ”two processes“ in the course of historical development and can be explained by the ideas of the ”two processes.“ Therefore, we must adhere to the principle of ”two processes“ Rather than other opinions as the basic clues of modern history. In this regard, I have two different views. First, I think Comrade Mao Zedong did not use ”two processes“ to summarize the basic clues of modern Chinese history. The so-called ”two processes“ are summarized from the passage of ”Chinese Revolution and the Communist Party of China“ (hereinafter referred to as the original): ”The combination of imperialism and Chinese feudalism turns China into a semi-colony and a colony process,