论文部分内容阅读
导言“话语权利”是做文化比较研究的学者所津津乐道的一个词语,其始作俑者不得而知。20世纪90年代,《读书》杂志曾经刊发文章阐释了在前现代主义时期“欧洲中心主义”和后现代主义时期“美国话语霸权”的挤压之下.中国文化作为一种弱势文化逐渐陷入“失语状态”的痛苦历程和尴尬现状,并呼吁进行价值重构和文化重建,以恢复中国文化和中国学人的话语权利。这些文章充满了思辨色彩,使用了大量的形而上的词汇.不过没有对“话语权利”给出一个概念化的定义。笔者以为所谓“话语权利”就是指作为体系构成部分之一
INTRODUCTION “Discourse Right ” is one of the most talked-about words of scholars who are doing cultural comparative studies, with no explanation for their origin. In the 1990s, Reading magazine published an article explaining that under the pressure of pre-modernist period “Eurocentrism” and postmodernism “American discourse hegemony”, Chinese culture as a The disadvantaged culture gradually plunges into the painful history and awkward situation of “aphasia ” and calls for the reconstruction of values and cultural reconstruction in order to restore the Chinese culture and the discourse rights of Chinese scholars. These articles are full of speculative color, use a lot of metaphysical words, but did not give a conceptual definition of “discourse right ”. I think the so-called “discourse right ” refers to as one of the components of the system