一、序论在以前,就让与担保而言,一般的说法是信托让与说。其中有两种通常的见解:其一,以让与担保为信托法上的信托;其二,让与担保权利人拥有标的物的完全所有权。但是让与担保权人和设立人的关系受到债权的约束,为防止担保权利人对标的物行使担保目的以外的权利,所以应从设立人处受让标的物的信托。后者可以说是通说,至今仍存在如后者那样对让与担保的法律构成进行解释的学说。但是,根据1944年2月5日的大判民事判例集第23卷第 First, the preamble In the past, let and guarantee, the general argument is to let the trust and said. There are two common views: first, the grant of trust is trust law; second, the grantor has the full title of the subject matter. However, the bond with the guarantor and the founders is subject to the obligee’s rights and the trust of the transferee shall be established from the point of view of preventing the security right holder from exercising the security purpose of the subject matter. The latter can be said as saying that there still exists the doctrine of interpreting the constitution of the security of assignment as the latter still has. However, according to Daikyoku civil case set vol. 23 of February 5, 1944