一切都表明,托马斯·S·库恩教授的科学范式概念从今以后被公认为对讨论和研究科学变革逻辑的重要、独创和决定性的贡献。但是仍然有一些不太令人满意的地方,尤其是对于哲学家们来说。这个问题表现为几个方面。首先,这个概念令人满意或不令人满意都使我们想起,笛卡儿和培根尽管有不同的看法,但都要我们提防科学传统可能有害的影响,暗示研究始终应该有所进展,好象另一个时代的研究丝毫没有解决问题,好象已经获得的知识完全可能是十足的偏见,好象研究人员应该 Everything shows that the concept of the scientific paradigm taught by Professor Thomas S. Kuhn has since been recognized as an important, original and decisive contribution to discussing and studying the logic of scientific change. But there are still some less than satisfactory places, especially for philosophers. There are several aspects to this problem. First of all, whether this concept is satisfactory or unsatisfactory reminds us, Descartes and Bacon, in spite of their different opinions, need to beware of the potentially detrimental effects of the scientific tradition, suggesting that research should always be progressing as if Another era of research did not solve the problem, as if already obtained knowledge is entirely possible bias, as if researchers should