论文部分内容阅读
以解释论为指导,《著作权法》第1条的立法原则以及第47、48条的具体规则为建筑作品不停止侵权提供了法律依据;而作品构成要件虚置、权利取得的非公示性以及停止侵权的高额移除成本构成建筑作品不停止侵权的特殊理由。为了防止虚置著作权人,不停止侵权应当满足主观善意、经济理性、可替代性等要件,并以恢复原状和损害赔偿作为替代责任。但替代责任的判决应坚持民事诉讼中的处分原则,当事人的程序利益可借助法院释明制度予以充分保障。
Based on the interpretation theory, the legislative principle of Article 1 of the Copyright Law and the specific rules of Article 47 and Article 48 provide the legal basis for the construction works to stop infringement; the composition of the works is not the truth, the non-publicity of the rights acquisition and The high removal costs of stopping infringement constitute a special case of architectural works that do not stop infringing. In order to prevent infringement of the copyright owner, the infringement of the copyright should be satisfied with the elements of subjective goodwill, economic rationality and substitutability, with the responsibility of restitution of the status quo and compensation for damages as an alternative. However, the judgment of alternative liability should insist on the principle of punishment in civil litigation. The procedural interests of the parties can be fully guaranteed by means of the court’s explanation system.