论文部分内容阅读
学术界公认《录鬼簿续编》的作者为贾仲明,这一观点值得质疑。因为该书中列有贾仲明自己,但介绍的口气并非第一人称,且过分自诩,还用“尝传”语气叙述贾仲明的旧事,更不提增补《录鬼簿》的事实,而对此贾氏是直言不讳的。另外,该书吊词的写作原则既不同于锺嗣成的原作,也不同于贾仲明的增补本。鉴于以上矛盾,《录鬼簿续编》的作者并非贾仲明。讨论这个问题,对于《录鬼簿续编》以及中国戏曲史的研究,对于最终解决罗贯中的籍贯和生卒年月等悬案,都具有重要的学术价值。
Academically recognized as “ghost book continued editing” author Jia Zhongming, this view is questionable. Because of the book, there is Jia Zhongming himself, but his tone of introduction is not the first person and he is over-represented. He also used the taste of “taste-passing” to describe Jia’s old story, not to mention the fact that “recorded ghost book” ’S is outspoken. In addition, the writing principle of the book is different from the original works of Chung-Sung Chung, but also different from Jiazhong Ming’s supplement. In view of the above contradictions, “ghost album renewal” is not the author of Jia Zhongming. The discussion of this issue and the study of “Catalog of Prologue” and the history of Chinese opera have an important academic value for solving the pending cases such as Luo Guanzhong’s birth date.