论文部分内容阅读
一解释法律,应从文章解释之通则,殆为世所公认。所谓文章解释,即以阐明法文多表示之意思与实质为目的之解释。欲达此目的,应并用文理解释于伦理解释,自不待言,但一般学者,多漠视社会常识观念,主张极端文理解释或极端伦理解释;于是法律观念与社会常识,遂有两相背驰之倾向。夫法律,所以调和实际生活现象者也,解释法律而不顾社会常识观念,则去法律之本旨远矣。兹述刑法上之一二事例如右:
A law to explain, should be explained from the article general rules, almost universally acknowledged. The so-called article explanation, that is to clarify the meaning of the French multi-meaning and substance for the purpose of the explanation. In order to achieve this goal, we should interpret the ethical explanation with the liberal arts. However, most scholars disregard the common sense of social common sense and advocate extremist or ethical interpretation or extreme ethical interpretation. Therefore, there is a divergence between legal concepts and social common sense tendency. The law of the husband, so to reconcile the actual phenomenon of life, to explain the law regardless of the concept of social common sense, then go to the essence of the law. One or two of the criminal laws described above, for example, right: