论文部分内容阅读
实践中,检察机关普遍运用个案监督的方法,对个案判决、裁定认定事实和适用法律是否正确进行监督。不可否认,个案监督对实现个案公正起了重要作用,但检察机关面对为数不少的量刑失衡、偏轻偏重判决所导致的事实上不公正现象存在,无从下手监督,使个案监督所取得的效果大打折扣。造成这种现象的原因是多方面的,传统的以个案为中心的量刑监督方式存在的固有缺陷,是其中的重要原因。因此,有必要在个案监督之外开辟新的监督方法,建立类案监督制度,以加强量刑监督。
In practice, procuratorial organs generally use the method of case supervision to supervise whether the case decision, the determination of the facts of affirmation and the applicable law are correct. It is undeniable that case supervision plays an important role in realizing the impartiality of the case. However, in the face of a large number of sentencing imbalances, the procuratorial organs are overly concerned with the de facto unfairness resulting from judgments. They can not supervise and make the cases supervised The effect is greatly reduced. The reasons for this phenomenon are many. The inherent defects in the traditional case-based sentencing supervision are the important reasons behind this. Therefore, it is necessary to open up a new method of supervision beyond the case supervision and set up a system of case supervision so as to strengthen the supervision of sentencing.