借用学界关于达·芬奇译名的论辩为引子,概略探讨文化相对主义和历史相对主义的策略介入后,翻译批评所应呈现出的兼容并蓄、参差多样的理想形态,同时也指出了目前以语言学批评为主流的翻译批评现实的成因与存在的合理性。除了分析现存的翻译批评格局,这一描写性比照研究的用意也在于思考国内翻译批评实践拓展的可能。 Borrowing academic argument about Leonardo da Vinci as an introduction, this paper briefly discusses the strategies of cultural relativism and historical relativism after intervention, and the translation criticism should show the ideal of diversity, diversity and diversity. At the same time, it points out that linguistics Criticize the Causes and Existential Rationality of Critical Translation as the Mainstream. In addition to analyzing the existing pattern of translation criticism, this descriptive comparison study is also intended to reflect on the possibility of expanding the practice of domestic translation criticism.