论文部分内容阅读
本组文章是上一期哲学栏目中的专题研究《当代哲学研究的前沿问题》的续篇。其中,苏州大学任平教授认为“当前哲学研究的问题”指向一种“问题视域”的立场和范式,引领我们去深刻理解马克思在哲学革命中提出的“反思的问题视域”及其当代意义;反思和解答新全球化时代的重大问题是马克思主义哲学当代在场的主要方式。华中科技大学欧阳康教授从哲学合法性追问的问题维度,探讨了哲学问题的实质与哲学思维方式的特点,并提出当前哲学研究的问题链,认为哲学研究是在对于人性的深层发掘和对世界价值意义的探索与创造中互动性地展开的。复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心、哲学系冯平教授将对价值观念和思维方式的批判和建构视为哲学的工作方式,认为“为获得思想资源的解释”是一种有强烈的现实问题意识和现实关怀的研究。在中国现实背景中,“对解释的解释”必须以对中国问题的关怀为动力。中山大学逻辑与认知研究所、浙江大学认知与语言研究中心鞠实儿教授从人文与科学两方面探讨了逻辑学认知转向的可能性、理论基础、主要形态和基本特点,论证了逻辑的文化依赖与文明的平等原则,认为逻辑学将面临的重大问题是跨文明说理的规则问题。至此,《当代哲学研究的前沿问题》专题已连续刊发两组文章,关于该专题的讨论将暂告一段落。但本栏目今后仍将继续坚持以问题为导向,展开学术评论。欢迎商榷、批评、讨论。
This essay is a sequel to the thematic study “The Frontier Issues in Contemporary Philosophical Research” in the last philosophical section. Among them, Ren Ping, a professor at Soochow University, holds that “the problems of the current philosophical research” point to a position and paradigm of “problem horizon” and lead us to deeply understand the “horizon of reflective issues” that Marx proposed in the philosophical revolution and its contemporary Significance; the major issue of reflecting and answering major issues in the new globalization era is the contemporary presence of Marxist philosophy. Professor Ouyang Kang from Huazhong University of Science and Technology from the dimension of questioning of the legitimacy of philosophy explores the essence of philosophical problems and the characteristics of philosophical thinking mode and puts forward the question chain of current philosophical research. He believes that philosophical research is based on the deep exploration of human nature and its impact on the world The value of the meaning of the exploration and creation of interactive development. Professor Fuping, a contemporary foreign Marxist research center at Fudan University and professor of philosophy at Fudan University, regards the critique and construction of values and modes of thinking as a philosophical mode of operation. He holds that “to obtain an explanation of ideological resources” is a strong sense of reality And realistic care research. In the context of China’s reality, “interpretation of explanations” must be based on caring for the China issue. Professor Jusheng Er from Institute of Logic and Cognitive Studies, Center for Cognition and Linguistics, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhejiang University, explored the possibilities, theoretical bases, main forms and basic features of logic cognitive shift from the aspects of humanities and sciences. Cultural dependence and the principle of equality of civilizations, that the major issues that logic will face are the rules of cross-civilization rationale. Up to this point, two groups of articles have been published on the topic of “Frontier Issues in Contemporary Philosophical Studies,” and the discussion on the topic will come to an end. However, this column will continue to adhere to the problem-oriented, academic review. Welcome to discuss, criticism, discussion.