论文部分内容阅读
通过对于两种“历史书写”的相对区分,本文尝试在人类实践的复杂过程中,来窥探在“前人活动”与“后人书写”间的微妙裂缝。如果说,所谓“历史二”代表了后人想要涂抹出历史“连续性”的努力,并且由此代表了一种具有主观性的话语力,那么,所谓“历史一”则代表了前人所顽强留下的史料遗迹,而且它作为一种“反权力”还在不断地挑战既有的史学话语。围绕着“历史一”与“历史二”之间复杂而吊诡的关系,可以看到历史学在当今所遭遇的危险与机遇。
Through the relative distinction between the two kinds of “historical writing”, this article attempts to explore the subtle cracks between the “predecessors” and the “descendants” in the complicated process of human practice. If we say that the so-called “history II” represents the descendants’ efforts to smear out history “continuity” and thus represents a subjective discourse, then the so-called “history” “It represents the historical relics tenaciously left by our predecessors, and it is constantly challenging the existing historical discourses as an” anti-power. “ Around the complex and paradoxical relationship between ”history one “ and ”history two ", we can see the dangers and opportunities encountered by history in today.