论文部分内容阅读
19世纪中期奥斯曼主持下的巴黎改造不仅打造出了现代大都市神话,也代表城市规划进入了崭新的时代,然而这一经典案例却引发了本雅明、哈维和索亚等城市理论家的反思和批判。本雅明着眼于巴黎城市居民的空间体验,从美学出发探讨了空间剥夺和城市异化;哈维聚焦于巴黎城市的空间生产,从政治经济学出发揭示了空间不平等与资本逻辑的内在关联;索亚专注于巴黎城周边的城郊住宅区,从城市地理学出发审视空间非正义与社会控制的联系。三位理论家关于巴黎城市改造的观点不仅为我们理解城市规划中空间非正义提供了重要维度,也为中国大规模的城市化改造提供了有益的启示。
The transformation of Paris under the auspices of Ottoman in the mid-19th century not only created the myth of modern metropolis, but also represented a new era in urban planning. However, this classic case provoked the reflection of urban theoreticians Benjamin, Harvey and Soya criticism. Benjamin focused on the space experience of urban residents in Paris and explored space deprivation and urban alienation from the perspective of aesthetics. Harvey focused on the space production in Paris city, and revealed the inherent relationship between spatial inequality and capital logic from the perspective of political economy. Asia focused on suburban residential areas around Paris, starting from urban geography to examine the relationship between spatial injustice and social control. The three theorists’ views on the urban renewal in Paris not only provide an important dimension for us to understand spatial injustice in urban planning, but also provide useful enlightenment for China’s large-scale urbanization.